Thanks to Michelle Boutwell, SETRC trainer at Erie 2 CC BOCES who compiled the piece below. 

State Performance Plan Indicator #2 addresses the drop out rate for students with disabilities.  At the end of the first phase of our SPP, the expectation is that no more than 19.9% of SWDs will drop out (the bar will only get higher).  When a district is targeted as being at risk or in need of intervention for SPP #1(graduation) and SPP#2, we focus our attention at all three levels of students’ school careers.  We look for early warning signs at the elementary and middle school levels and target groups of students at the high school level who fall into the “at risk” category and see if we can keep them from jumping ship.

Here are some signs that you can look for in building risk profiles for your students: (2 or more research studies have supported these findings)

Elementary
• Low achievement (use universal screening data)
• Retention (student is older than his peers)
• Poor attendance
• Low socioeconomic status  

Middle School

• High-risk peer group
• High-risk behavior
• Low achievement
• Retention (older than his peers)
• Poor attendance
• Low educational expectations from school personnel
• Low socioeconomic status
• High family mobility
• Low family expectations
• Low family contact with the school
• Low number of family centered conversations about school

High School

• High number of work hours
• Parenthood
• Low achievement
• Retention (older than his peers)  1 grade of retention increases the risk by 40%; 2 grades of retention increases the risk by 90%
• Attendance  (Does your attendance policy contribute to low attendance?)
• Low educational expectations from the school
• Low commitment to school
• No extracurricular activity participation
• Misbehavior
• Low socioeconomic status
• Low education of parents
• Not living with both parents
• The top 5 reasons that students from ages 16-25 give for dropping out: (Rotermund, California Dropout Research Project, Statistical Brief #2, May 2007)
        1. Classes not interesting  47%
        2. Missed too many days of school  43%
        3. Friends are not interested in school  42%
        4. Excess freedom/too few life rules  38%
        5. Failing school  35%

Once we identify the students who are at high risk of dropping out of school, our collective challenge is trying to prevent it.  Between October 2005 and October 2006 enough students dropped out of US schools to fill 9, 690 school buses!  Think about what that does to our country’s economic and health care challenges.

Check out the National Dropout Prevention Center Network at Clemson University for more information.

Today our center was visted by a team of educators from the Alleghany Limestone School district in the Cattaraugus County of Western New York.  This visit was prompted by an up coming Committe on Special Education meeting that has been called next week to seek placement for a 10th grade autistic male student. 

The essential question posed by the educational team was:

How does an educational team document via the IEP the social skills training that is mandatory for all autistic students without sacrificing academic time on task, through counselling and speech service pull outs particularly when the students who are at the higher end of the spectrum disorder show no indication of needing these services, but parents insist that the law demands it?

Here are some of the answers provided by the Hewes Special Education Team:

Social skills are embedded in the curriculum and are addressed throughout the day in every subject.

Social skills are practiced and taught through mandated counselling and speech services either as a push-in or a pull out.  Documentation for this service can be provided by using applied behavior analysis produced by the classroom teachers, speech teachers and counselors.  This data should then be reflected in all segments of the IEP in particular – the PLEP statement, the social, physical and management sections of the IEP;  in the area of needs and accommodations. 

For autistic students, 5 times a week of speech is mandatory but this is really for the severe student.  In recognition of the fact that autism is now considered a spectrum disorder education law has not changed to accommodate Regents Diploma Bound high school students who indicate no specific need for pragmatic speech development or social skills training.  In this scenario, the law has not caught up with what teachers observe in the classroom particularly when examining students with autism and asperger’s syndrome.  Until that time comes educators have to practice policies that are legally defensible and show full appreciation for the needs of autistic students. 

Some school districts seek a waiver from parents indicating that they have understood that in a given school day, removing the students five times a week from the classroom to provide a related service like speech/counselling/social skills training has the affect of delaying high school graduation for these students, so that instead of taking 4 years these students may take 5 or more because in the school day, there just isn’t enough time to get all the academics programmed in a school year. 

The above team visit has flavored the way we at the HewesCenter view our work in terms of documenting our educational practices with Special needs students. 

This last week in April has been a tough one for me.  I received one letter of retirement, attended a good bye party for an aide who resigned to join the military, learnt of the mysterious operation of one teacher, toured a public school that is going to take students back from the BOCES, because the school has the staff and facilities to do so;   had to deal with an employee issue that was murky from the beginning and only got more so as the week progressed.  I feel battered and bruised.  The last issue is the most disconcerting.  However, some things are predictable I am told so we are all more learned the next time around. 

The student issue regarding the ability of a school district to educate its own, is actually very exciting.  Four special education classrooms fully equipped with staff, materials and dependable outcomes in terms of student exit at the end of high school are already in place within the component school.  Our Hewes Center has students that the district can educate and trade us.  Essentially we at the Hewes Center can return 4-5 students whose exit will be an IEP diploma and receive in return 8 students with the potential to receive High School Regents Diplomas ( one of the highest general education diplomas besides Advanced Regents) within 4 years.  This will be a win-win for the BOCES because we shall be able to curb the high drop out rate being experienced by this school district, improve the passing grades for graduating cohorts, increase college enrollments but most importantly help students navigate the road of success who otherwise would not have – students classified LD, high spectrum autism, ED, OHI would all fall in this category. 

Why is the Hewes Center poised at this time for such a  ready challenge?  We have 9 teachers who are now Highly Qualified and Certified Grades 7-12, in the core academic content areas whose committement to teaching, learning and students can pull this off with ease.  We have been working on this program plan for 5 years and every year we have grown this plan by recruiting teachers who are qualified, staffing the program with the right amount of paraprofessional support and infusing the classrooms with needed educational technology. 

The above plan will take effort and passion.  The teachers and staff at the Center are ready for this challenge.  The BOCES is living its mission….. After the tour of the 4 classrooms, debriefing about how this plan might work, selling the idea to the local school in terms of student outcomes, program qualification, drop out strategies and prevention, our next step will be a tour of our programs by the High School CSE chair and a Guidance Counselor.  One teacher has already visited from that High School and is impressed with what he sees and motivated by his role in this plan.  The other three teachers in the district know that the plan will take place and are inquiring about the students who will be returning.  CSE meetings have to be set within the next 7 weeks to plan for the return of these students and well as for the transfer of others to the BOCES.   We are stoked!

Buffalo St. leads child-learning study

Business First of Buffalo – by Allissa Kline

I and two other professional colleagues both retired school administrators and special ed. supervisors, have been invited to speak to a group of 10 graduate students in the School of Education, St. Bonaventure University, Olean, NY by my friend and colleague, Dr. Paula Kenneson.  The time allotment is 2.5 hours and the lecture is outlined below.  My purpose is to elicit support for starting a bridging venture with St. Bona’s that will result in placing student teachers with teachers of Alternative and Special Education at the Hewes Center.  I believe that these teachers have a particular and specialized skills set that has been honed and perfected based on education, training and experience which is bar none the best that I have seen to date.  I say this because, these teachers take on students after all strategies have been tried, adopted and modified and then, when out of school district placement is sought for students at a BOCES or regional educational center, teachers are forced to debunk all past practice and start afresh with a new bag of behavioral knowledge tricks based on different incentives and teacher skills sets.   

Objectives The students will be able to:

·     Explain the major considerations in determining whether the school has met its obligation to provide a free and appropriate education.

·     Outline the requirements in conducting a nondiscriminatory evaluation to determine eligibility and related services.

·     List the components of an Individualized Education Program (IEP) required by the IDEA.

·     Discuss the major factors the courts consider in determining the least restrictive environment.

·     Describe the procedural due process protections afforded parents under the IDEA.

·     Compare the eligibility requirements of the IDEA with those of Section 504.

·     Distinguish between the requirements placed on school districts under the ADA and those under Section 504.

Guiding Principles

·     The IDEA mandates that school districts make a free and appropriate public education available to all children with disabilities between the ages of 3 and 21.

·     In order to receive services (i.e., special education programs and related services), a student must have a qualifying disability and the condition must have an impact on education to an extent that requires special education.

·     An Individualized Education Program (or plan) (IEP) is a written document that provides the plan for implementation of the special education program and related services.

·     The IEP meeting, at which the plan is developed, must include parents, teachers, special education specialists, a school representative, and the student, when appropriate.

·     To be appropriate the IEP must be reasonably calculated to confer educational benefits for the student.

·     The IDEA requires that the student receive the special education services in the least restrictive environment, based on his or her individual specialized needs.

·     Parents have a number of procedural rights under the IDEA including the right to notice, consent, and ability to challenge decisions through an administrative hearing process.

·     Section 504 prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities. It is broader than IDEA and is intended to prevent discrimination rather than require the delivery of services.

·     The Americans With Disabilities Act prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities in services, programs, and activities.

I am looking for comments, suggestions and anecdotes to share in this session with the graduate class at St. Bonaventure.  I will be incorporating web 2.0 tools.